www.testfreaks.se

Recensioner, recensioner, recensioner...

9.0 av 10 116 recensioner

Olympus M. Zuiko Digital 17mm F2.8 Pancake

Information funnen i:

  • Användarbetyg (106)
    8.7 8.7 från 106 recensenter
  • Expertbetyg (3)
    7.9 7.9 från 3 recensenter
  • Prisvärdhet (3)
    8.9 8.9 från 3 recensenter
Mer underbetyg Mindre betyg
  • Betygsspridning

Experter:
9-10
(1)
7-8
(2)
5-6
(0)
3-4
(0)
1-2
(0)
Användare:
9-10
(56)
7-8
(36)
5-6
(12)
3-4
(1)
1-2
(1)
  • Expertrecensioner

  1. ePHOTOzine

    Ephotozine.32822775
    7.0/10
    3 september 2012

    This compact pancake lens sports a fast f/2.8 maximum aperture and is compatible with all Micro Four Thirds cameras. The isn't equipped with in lens stabilisation ,which is typical for pancake lenses, but Olympus camera owners will be able to take advantage of their camera's in-body stabilisation system. Läs mer Översätt till svenska

    • Very good sharpness overall, Good build quality, Lightweight, Compact, Reasonably priced
    • High levels of barrel distortion, High levels of CA
  2. PhotographyBLOG

    8 maj 2011

    With the lens attached to an Olympus E-P2 camera body, focusing is fairly quick but by no means instantaneous. As long as you are photographing still or slowly moving subjects, you will find the focusing speed entirely adequate. Note: given that Micro Four Thirds cameras use contrast-detect autofocus, whose speed also depends on their sensors' read-out speed, the lens may perform better on a different or future MFT body. Läs mer Översätt till svenska

  3. digicambuyer.co.uk

    Digicambuyer-co-uk.32818434
    8.0/10
    21 januari 2013

    It doesn’t feel and handle quite like a classic pancake lens, but the Olympus 17mm f2.8 makes up for it with its slim line design, light weight and high resolution. Läs mer Översätt till svenska

  4. LensTip.com

    9 juli 2009

    Looking at the above list of pros and cons, you can see that the latter are quite a number. I guess it’s inevitable. You just can’t make a lens of these dimensions, these parameters that is free of aberrations. Alright, alright… Let’s say you can. Leica would probably do it, but then we’d have to pay not 300$ but 10 times more. Läs mer Översätt till svenska

    • chromatic aberration going from medium to large with stopping down,, very large distortion,, coma visible at the maximum aperture,, working against bright light could be better,, noticeable vignetting at the maximum aperture.
  5. What Digital Camera

    What-digital-camera.32818507
    8.7/10
    17 april 2010

    A 17mm wide angle Micro Four Thirds lens from Olympus Läs mer Översätt till svenska

  • Användarrecensioner

  1. Serious contender

    Wex.33757758
    10/10
    Recensent: Streetshooter, WEX
    4 maj 2011

    This is a superb lens!I recently bought an EPL-1 with a 14-42 zoom, which is good, but, this lens has turned the whole purpose of buying the camera on its head. I'm used to Canon full frame camera's with Canon EF L lenses, and bought the EPL-1 just as a "carry about" camera for anything and everything. I shoot pictures primarily for a well known image library, which my Canon's do well. Läs mer Översätt till svenska

    • Consistent Output, Lightweight, Sharp Focus
    • No cons
  2. great little lens

    Amazon.32817386
    10/10
    Recensent: Paul Stanyer, Amazon
    18 december 2012

    Really happy with this lens; it's nice and compact so perfect for when I just want a small unobtrusive camera to carry around, and pictures are effortlessly sharper than when using the supplied zoom lenses. Läs mer Översätt till svenska

  3. Older design holding up

    B-h-photo.32817553
    8.0/10
    Recensent: Theo, B&H Photo
    20 maj 2014

    The 14-42 IIR kit zoom is too bulky for a jacket pocket; therefore I bought this 17 f2.8 for my E-PM2 for lightweight daily carry. This prime lens fits fine in my pocket as planned. As this stage of its life, it is being sold at a discount at most places and even cheaper bought second hand. Are there any advantages other than compact size? A review here concluded that the 14-42 is sharper than 17 f2.8; I totally disagree. Läs mer Översätt till svenska

    • Consistent Output, Easily Interchangeable, Lightweight, Nice Bokeh, Sharper Than Kit Lens
    • Slow Focus
  4. I got this from A& R photo

    Amazon.32817384
    10/10
    Recensent: S. Yoon, Amazon
    16 april 2014

    I got this lens for my Panasonic GM-1. At first, on the Internet, this lens is underrated but somehow once I recieved it tested it, this lens produce very sharp images. Personally I think handling and rotation of the lens is quite nice. Although it is bit noisy when autofocus, but it does give a good job. If you are a student and you don't have budget on f1.7, I would recommend this. A&R photo is kindly to provide a lens hood, and all accessories you need. Läs mer Översätt till svenska

  5. This lens suits me perfectly.

    Ebay.33759263
    10/10
    Recensent: phil6152, Ebay
    8 april 2014

    I know that the F1.8 is regarded as a better lens, but it costs half as much again and it is 1 cm wider. I wanted a slim lens so that the E-M1 would still slip into my briefcase. Läs mer Översätt till svenska

  • WikiFreak Beskrivning

Skapa en Wiki beskrivning av produkten

Frågor och svar

Vill du veta mer? Ställ en fråga!

Videorecensioner